Text that automatically appears in the Failure Effects box of new failure modes. The user can change the text as needed.

Text that automatically appears in the Task box of new action plans. The user can change the text as needed.

When Only entries in the usage groups selected below are available is selected, failure modes can be based on library entries assigned the specified usage groups. This means that, when you browse for library entries to add to an RBI analysis, entries with the selected usage groups are included in the list to select from. Usage groups that are not selected are not included in the list.

This option can be selected when Only entries in the usage groups selected below are available is selected. When you browse for library failure modes to add to an RBI analysis, entries that are not assigned to a usage group are included in the list to select from.

The selected rate is fixed – the rate is always set manually
The selected rate is variable – the rate is set automatically whenever rates are calculated. Choose the auto-selection policy.

Use the standard APM calculation – The calculation supplied by APM
Use this calculation – Select the custom calculation from the list

Automatically add indicators – when an inspection task is added, indicators currently on the action plan are added to the standard task, if they are not there already. When indicators are subsequently added to the action plan, they are automatically added to the task.

Failure mode asset – the barrier is assigned to the asset on the failure mode by default
Primary asset – the barrier is assigned to the primary asset on the analysis by default

When this option is selected, the Optimization view is available in the analysis window. Using the integration functionality in APM, you can export failure modes from MTA2 and RCM2 analyses to the Isograph® Availability Workbench (AWB), where you can analyze and optimize the data. You can then import optimization results into the APM analysis, review the recommendations in the Optimization view, and make appropriate changes to the action plans.

Hide or show the Analysis note and Evaluation comments areas in the Maintenance Action Plan window.
Tip: The analyst can add information to the Analysis Note and Evaluation Note tabs located in the Details view, if available.

Use evaluation forms – The analysis team uses wizards to evaluate the probability of failure, economic consequences, health and safety consequences, environmental consequences, and confidence factors. APM then calculates the risk and shows it in the risk matrix. This process is commonly used with RBI analyses.
Use weighted severity and relative risk – The analyst assesses the severity of economic, health and safety, and environmental consequences, assigning a number (weighting) to each factor. The analyst also enters the probability of failure and the confidence factor. APM then calculates the relative risk and shows it in the risk matrix.
Not performed – No risk analysis is performed.

Type of MTA2 report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the MTA2 is marked “Closed”.

Type of MTA2 report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the MTA2 template is marked “Closed”.

Type of RCM2 report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the RCM2 analysis is marked “Closed”.

Type of RCM2 report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the RCM2 template is marked “Closed”.

Type of CPR report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the current practice review is marked “Closed”.

Type of RBI report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the risk-based inspection analysis is marked “Closed”.

Type of SIF report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the analysis is marked “Closed”.

Type of SIF report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the analysis is marked “Closed”.

Type of report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the HAZOP analysis is marked “Closed”.

Type of report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the HAZOP template is marked “Closed”.

Type of report to be created and added to the History view, Analysis Audit Info tab when the design FMECA is marked “Closed”.

The analyzed asset only – Only the assets included in the current analysis have their consequence priority numbers or conditions updated
The analyzed assets and assets in the same branch of the hierarchy – Only the assets included in the analysis and their descendants and ancestors in the hierarchy are updated
The analyzed asset and assets above it – Only the assets included in the analysis and their ancestors in the hierarchy are updated
The analyzed asset and assets below it – Only the assets included in the analysis and their descendants in the hierarchy are updated

This option takes into account the selected Analysis results apply to option. For example, if descendant assets are to be updated and Update previously is selected, all assets below the analysis asset in the hierarchy are updated, whether they have been analyzed separately or not.
If Update previously is not selected, descendant assets are updated until the system identifies an asset that has been analyzed separately. At that point, the update process stops.

Select from a list of probabilities – When performing the prioritization analysis, you can select one of the failure probabilities defined for the enterprise
Probability criterion analysis – Perform a probability analysis when performing an asset prioritization analysis

Highest ranking – Of the examples that the user chooses during the analysis, the one with the highest score is selected. The score is matched to a probability of failure
Sum of selections – The scores for the chosen examples are added together and the probability closest to, but not less than, the sum is selected
Lowest ranking – Of the examples the user chooses during the analysis, the one with the lowest score is selected. The score is matched to a probability of failure
Probability criteria matrix – The selected matrix is used to determine the probability of failure